Thank goodness our favorite president is in office a few more hours to celebrate this gem of a holiday: National Sanctity of Human Life Day.
It's about celebrating our "moral values" and protecting the most vulnerable in society, so on and so on. But there's nothing that would answer the questions I have about the sanctity of life. For example, why didn't the proposed Colorado amendment from the 2008 elections have any mention of protecting a woman's life, when a fertilized egg becomes lodged in her fallopian tube until she bleeds to death? Or if you're so concerned with making sure all life is welcome in this world, why is the federal government continuing to fund abstinence-only education that has no evidence of preventing teen pregnancy?
Or here's one... if life is so precious, should we maybe stop and think before invading a country of 2,000,000 people that had little to nothing to do with the 9-11 terrorist attacks?
Just throwing those ideas out there for clarification, I do love the sanctity of human life but something seems quirky here. In a violent country where children go without food and healthcare while we fund wars overseas, it seems like the pre-born would be the least of our worries... unless, that is, you could use them as an excuse to restrict women's freedoms. Which you can! How convenient!
Editor's note: I had linked to the whitehouse press release for this article: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases ... 18-10.html But the link no longer works because there's been some kind of CHANGE today, January 20 2009. Thank you Obama web team, I love you!









Fiddler of the SNSDW
ARRR!
