Moderator: Moderators

Captain of the SNSDWElanna wrote:I read that about ten times, I though you were calling me a cowgirl. You know, do it, cowgirl.
spacefem wrote:storage has armpit fleas.


Dragonrider wrote: I'm confident enough in my personality that I know that people will, given the time to get to know me, be able to see past whatever meatlike characteristics I have.



Why should I have to handle being objectified? I am a person, not a fire hydrant - they are objects. I don't like being whistled at - you whistle at dogs. Not people, thanks.Le_Pingouin wrote:Are you so insecure that you can't handle being objectified? Is your identity that frail?





Zeph wrote:Plus, how do you react to that?
spacefem wrote:incidently, hearing "i love you" doesn't count if you're naked. it's just too easy to love a naked person.
RD wrote:My armpits are the only area of my body that almost always stays clean-shaven, because if I let it go I feel like a 15-year-old boy trying to grow a beard. In my armpits.


Ssshadow wrote:That said, maybe this means I'd make a bad feminist, but I really didnt mind at all. Whenever it happened, the other girls and I would always have a good laugh, and I honestly find it more flattering than anything else. But maybe thats just because that sort of thing has never really happened to me personally.

Xinzang wrote:It's all about your perspective... you can take it badly or take it well. I find that the attitude is generally based on one's own self-confidence. If you let it get to you in a bad way instead of just shrugging it off, then every little thing like that which happens to you is going to always bring you down.
"It happens to men, too" and "It could be worse" are not valid arguments for why something is not a feminist issue. This is a feminist issue because it's about objectification of women - an attitude in society which leads to more violence towards women, an issue that certainly is to do with feminism.Xinzang wrote:Frankly, I don't know why this is in feminism. People get cat called all the time. It's not a women's rights issue, it's just people in cars being stupid/silly to people who aren't in cars. At least they didn't throw lit cigarettes at you or something... I've had THAT happen before too!
I don't think it's about being a good or bad feminist, but it's an issue that I think should be addressed.Ssshadow wrote:That said, maybe this means I'd make a bad feminist, but I really didnt mind at all.
But why are both acceptable? And is it right that honking at a girl, shouting at her as you drive past should be equally acceptable as a genuine, from the heart, compliment? IMHO a compliment is very different from a random drive by honk. A compliment is a considered, personal comment. A drive by honk is the modern equivalent of a caveman throwing a rock at an attractive cavewoman.Ssshadow wrote:...honking at a random girl on the side of the road as you speed by, never to see her again is a whole lot easier than actually giving a sincere complement to someone, face to face. And since both are generally seen as acceptable (maybe not desirable...) then I guess if I were a guy who wanted to point out a pretty girl, I'd rather do it the former way too.
This is exactly my point. Thank youimogene the fish wrote:Generally, I don't like being treated like a piece of meat. I'm not a piece of meat. Nor were my female ancestors, yet men got away with treating them like that. I don't want that to happen again. I don't think that's unreasonable.


lillerina wrote:"It happens to men, too" and "It could be worse" are not valid arguments for why something is not a feminist issue. This is a feminist issue because it's about objectification of women - an attitude in society which leads to more violence towards women, an issue that certainly is to do with feminism.Xinzang wrote:Frankly, I don't know why this is in feminism. People get cat called all the time. It's not a women's rights issue, it's just people in cars being stupid/silly to people who aren't in cars. At least they didn't throw lit cigarettes at you or something... I've had THAT happen before too!
Captain of the SNSDWElanna wrote:I read that about ten times, I though you were calling me a cowgirl. You know, do it, cowgirl.
spacefem wrote:storage has armpit fleas.

Dragonrider wrote:lillerina wrote:"It happens to men, too" and "It could be worse" are not valid arguments for why something is not a feminist issue. This is a feminist issue because it's about objectification of women - an attitude in society which leads to more violence towards women, an issue that certainly is to do with feminism.Xinzang wrote:Frankly, I don't know why this is in feminism. People get cat called all the time. It's not a women's rights issue, it's just people in cars being stupid/silly to people who aren't in cars. At least they didn't throw lit cigarettes at you or something... I've had THAT happen before too!
It is definitely an objectification of women. And I can definitely see why that can be upsetting.
I guess I should restate my question from before. Why don't men mind being objectified as much as women mind being objectified? How can we make this more equal, and in what way?

They kind of were.imogene the fish wrote:Because men weren't treated as objects for centuries.
Dr. Mung-Mung wrote:He weeps for he has but one small tongue with which to taste an entire world.

lillerina wrote:Can I make the point again that this is not me being insecure? This is me saying, I should not have to put up with this. The objectification of humans is not an acceptable act. As has been said many times, I'm not a piece of meat and don't appreciate being treated like one.
lillerina wrote:"It happens to men, too" and "It could be worse" are not valid arguments for why something is not a feminist issue. This is a feminist issue because it's about objectification of women - an attitude in society which leads to more violence towards women, an issue that certainly is to do with feminism.
lillerina wrote:But why are both acceptable? And is it right that honking at a girl, shouting at her as you drive past should be equally acceptable as a genuine, from the heart, compliment? IMHO a compliment is very different from a random drive by honk. A compliment is a considered, personal comment. A drive by honk is the modern equivalent of a caveman throwing a rock at an attractive cavewoman.
dragonrider wrote:I guess I should restate my question from before. Why don't men mind being objectified as much as women mind being objectified? How can we make this more equal, and in what way?

Xinzang wrote:Men DON'T like being objectified. What you just said is the opposite stereotype. Men have emotions and reactions to these kinds of things too. It's just like saying guys don't mind being hit as much because they are tougher. I don't like being hit, even playfully, and I will hit you back if you do it, regardless of your gender! Men are self-conscious about their bodies too, and their looks. The stereotype is that men SHOULDN'T mind being objectified because it puts them in a position of power since they are being admired. That puts the reverse pressure on us to take all sorts of crap from people, and then not have the right to complain about it. Whereas women are the opposite, and they are allowed to cry foul whenever the littlest things happen to them. It's all about feminism if you're a woman and you complain, and it's all about being a wimp if you complain and you're a guy. Men are objectified all the time and they aren't allowed to say boo about it.
Nice double standard!
ARRR!
lillerina wrote:But why are both acceptable? And is it right that honking at a girl, shouting at her as you drive past should be equally acceptable as a genuine, from the heart, compliment? IMHO a compliment is very different from a random drive by honk. A compliment is a considered, personal comment. A drive by honk is the modern equivalent of a caveman throwing a rock at an attractive cavewoman.Ssshadow wrote:...honking at a random girl on the side of the road as you speed by, never to see her again is a whole lot easier than actually giving a sincere complement to someone, face to face. And since both are generally seen as acceptable (maybe not desirable...) then I guess if I were a guy who wanted to point out a pretty girl, I'd rather do it the former way too.

Storage and Disposal wrote:They kind of were.imogene the fish wrote:Because men weren't treated as objects for centuries.
spacefem wrote:incidently, hearing "i love you" doesn't count if you're naked. it's just too easy to love a naked person.
RD wrote:My armpits are the only area of my body that almost always stays clean-shaven, because if I let it go I feel like a 15-year-old boy trying to grow a beard. In my armpits.

Dr. Mung-Mung wrote:He weeps for he has but one small tongue with which to taste an entire world.

Ssshadow wrote:And what does "IMHO" mean?
Captain of the SNSDWElanna wrote:I read that about ten times, I though you were calling me a cowgirl. You know, do it, cowgirl.
spacefem wrote:storage has armpit fleas.

Captain of the SNSDWElanna wrote:I read that about ten times, I though you were calling me a cowgirl. You know, do it, cowgirl.
spacefem wrote:storage has armpit fleas.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests