lykin005 wrote: But I do not intend to inflame or incite, I want to discuss
spacefem wrote:Dude, everybody called you a troll in that thread. It was like trollapolooza. Trollopois. Trollathon. Trollstock. 3 men and a troll. Gone with the troll. Troll wars: return of the troll. How I met this troll. Forest troll. Lord of the troll: followship of the troll. Trollon rouge. Cassatrolla. Citizen troll.
Dr. Mung-Mung wrote:He weeps for he has but one small tongue with which to taste an entire world.
monk wrote:I stopped giving a fuck about "them" in 1989.
This is how I would have phrased my first post were I not retarded Well done Hufflepuff.
spacefem wrote:agree, kelsa.
but anyway, I don't think howard was browbeaten at all. in fact he never even stated a logical reason why the prenup was bothering him, it wasn't like they wore him down, penny just presented the FIRST argument and it was on the side of "why he should sign it". if anything howard was insecure about the fact that his fiance made more money than him, and that's what the holdup really was.
spacefem wrote:which brings another fact to mind... what if the roles were reversed here? guys are forever getting high fives for protecting themselves against money-grubbing bitches when they bring out the prenup agreements. but when a woman does it, she gets the "what makes you think you're so important?". you can can fist-pump to kanye helling "holla we want prenup!" as long as he's talking about men holding onto their money. I guess women just aren't supposed to hold on to their money, or more likely, have it in the first place. I smell even more bullshit around this issue now than when I started this thread.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests