moderators: how would you assign them?

Whatever weirdo topics you feel like bringing up

Moderators: MFS, monk

Locked

How should we assign moderator status?

The select roving band of favorites (like now)
4
44%
1-2 mods per forum
0
No votes
The fewer the better
2
22%
Base it on posts
2
22%
No mods. mods stink.
1
11%
 
Total votes: 9

User avatar
spacefem
member
member
Posts: 7909
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 1:37 2002
Location: Kansas
Contact:

moderators: how would you assign them?

Post by spacefem » Wed Dec 25, 22:00 2002

It's a poll, but it's not an interesting one, so it's in this forum. I just keep getting the feeling that not everybody is happy with how the moderators are set up, some lost their status in the move, some gained status because of how things just are now... I'm just curious about how you all feel.

User avatar
angry-amy
member
member
Posts: 2653
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 19:47 2002
Location: The Land Of Oz
Contact:

Post by angry-amy » Wed Dec 25, 22:30 2002

who gained status with the way that things are now?

i am abstaining from the poll as my opinion would be biased.
"I am NOT an angry girl, but it seems that I've got everyone fooled. Everytime i say something they find hard to hear, they chalk it up to MY anger, and never THEIR OWN fear."
-Ani DiFranco

User avatar
Raavyn
member
member
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 6:19 2002
Location: Baltimore

Post by Raavyn » Wed Dec 25, 22:40 2002

imo, base it on who's been here the longest.
Shame, such a shame
I think I kind of lost myself again
Day, yesterday
Really should be leaving but I stay
Say, say my name
I need a little love to ease the pain

User avatar
tanooki
member
member
Posts: 3454
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 22:58 2002
Location: Baaaaaaa
Contact:

Post by tanooki » Thu Dec 26, 0:00 2002

if it were my forum spacefem i would base it on who you can trust, since you are giving ppl power to do things it should be ppl that you shouldnt have to worry about when you are not here... but then again thats what i think

but then again i couldnt help but click on "base it on number of posts" :P.... but seriously spacefem, i think it should be based on trust
Last edited by tanooki on Thu Dec 26, 0:02 2002, edited 1 time in total.
who let the dogs out... woof woof woof woof :puppy:

User avatar
Draak
member
member
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sat Nov 2, 0:40 2002
Location: Nine Hells
Contact:

Post by Draak » Thu Dec 26, 0:02 2002

I'm with Tanooki on this one...choose people you know and trust.

User avatar
Tweek
member
member
Posts: 5023
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 3:02 2002
Location: England
Contact:

Post by Tweek » Thu Dec 26, 4:44 2002

I think it best to just have a group of mods that cover the whole board rather than one or two per forum. It is best to select that group from people who post a reasonable amount, visit the board on a regular basis and most importantly who you trust.
ARG!!! I NEED COFFEE!!!

User avatar
Skalle
member
member
Posts: 798
Joined: Sat Nov 2, 13:20 2002

Post by Skalle » Thu Dec 26, 10:32 2002

Hmm.. I guess i dont think there shouldnt be ANY at all anymore. So this time ill go with the fewer the better.

User avatar
Skalle
member
member
Posts: 798
Joined: Sat Nov 2, 13:20 2002

Post by Skalle » Thu Dec 26, 10:39 2002

Oh and btw, dont base it on the amount of posts, base it on who generally only, hmm, interfere when hmm.. When busting people that use multiple accounts! (Like with stupiddeadgirl) Thats what mods should do! Not closing threads all the time, (altho i havent seen a single closed thread here in the new forums, thats cool! ) or editing people (unless its something harmful or sumfing ofcourse)

User avatar
FernGully
member
member
Posts: 6543
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 19:50 2002
Location: BEHIND YOU!

Post by FernGully » Thu Dec 26, 23:46 2002

I agree with Amy ::jumps on the Amy bandwagon:: <-- technically my OWN wagon but she painted it and all. Anywho, I am bias so I wont vote.
:fern:

Support Ferno-Raavynism! Down with oppressive Draakism!

User avatar
BCG
member
member
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 15:07 2002
Location: 'tis a silly place.

Post by BCG » Fri Dec 27, 11:39 2002

The way it is now doesn't bother me. There don't seem to be many problems (besides the multiple accounts thing) that the mods need to fix, lately.

I do think it should be based on trust, and on how long the person in question has been on the boards. Number of posts should have some seniority privileges, but a troll could easily have as many posts as a worthy member.
-Katrina
Leader of the Virgin Crew
:diamond: Hymens are a girl's best friend. :diamond:

User avatar
tanooki
member
member
Posts: 3454
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 22:58 2002
Location: Baaaaaaa
Contact:

Post by tanooki » Fri Dec 27, 20:11 2002

BCG wrote:The way it is now doesn't bother me. There don't seem to be many problems (besides the multiple accounts thing) that the mods need to fix, lately.

I do think it should be based on trust, and on how long the person in question has been on the boards. Number of posts should have some seniority privileges, but a troll could easily have as many posts as a worthy member.
are you calling me a troll?? you :monkey:



;)
who let the dogs out... woof woof woof woof :puppy:

User avatar
FernGully
member
member
Posts: 6543
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 19:50 2002
Location: BEHIND YOU!

Post by FernGully » Fri Dec 27, 20:39 2002

tanooki wrote:
BCG wrote:The way it is now doesn't bother me. There don't seem to be many problems (besides the multiple accounts thing) that the mods need to fix, lately.

I do think it should be based on trust, and on how long the person in question has been on the boards. Number of posts should have some seniority privileges, but a troll could easily have as many posts as a worthy member.
are you calling me a troll?? you :monkey:



;)
TROLL!
:fern:

Support Ferno-Raavynism! Down with oppressive Draakism!

User avatar
tanooki
member
member
Posts: 3454
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 22:58 2002
Location: Baaaaaaa
Contact:

Post by tanooki » Fri Dec 27, 20:47 2002

look whose talking.. hehe :P
who let the dogs out... woof woof woof woof :puppy:

Locked